Summary: Hey. Does anyone know what the difference between the regular cg1 and the new cg1 black pearl? I have been trying to figure it out, but without succes.
Thanks
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Review Date April 15, 2008
Overall Rating 5 of 5
Value Rating 5 of 5
Reviewed by: Sam(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed: Cleveland CG1 Black Pearls
Summary: Waited 2 months after purchase to write my review. Best blades in the market hands down. Vastly superior to Nike Forged blades and easier to hit than MP-33s. It does take some time to get used to the lofts though. You feel like a ton of distance has been lost, but in reality I think I have gained a little. Far and away best feel of any golf club I have ever hit. I let all my callaway toting friends hit my irons and they are just blown away. Great Clubs, I am thinking of buying another set so that when this set wear's out I can just unwrap the new set and be off and running.
Similar Products Used: MP-33s, Nike Forged Blades
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Summary: I counted the sets that I have played and it was 12. CG1 Black Pearls are so far the best. I just traded my Cobra Carbon CB which where great, but something kept tell me to get the CG1s. Fantastic clubs. Very accurate, just aim and swing. However, I'm still getting use to the longer irons 5 & 6. My 3 & 4 irons are hybrids. I've only played 3ea 9 holes since getting these, but i've shot 38, and 2 40s.
Customer Service: Not Used
Similar Products Used: MP-32,CG2,TA1,S58,Apex FTX, the list is endless....
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Review Date February 5, 2008
Overall Rating 3 of 5
Value Rating 4 of 5
Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
1 votes
Reviewed by: Sam Jones(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed: cleveland CG1 Black Pearl
Summary: These clubs are more difficult to hit than I first expected. I read many reviews on this post how forgiving they are but I found that not to be the truth. I would hit a horrible shot and then look at the club face and find it was only slightly off-center. On the plus, these clubs have made me a better golfer. I don't have money to buy a new set so I had to spend some serious time on the range and as a result I now hit a pretty nice ball with these sticks. I play a natural fade, but am able to hit a draw whenever I feel like it. A nice option I have never had before. Lost five yards with each club but mostly due to change in company lofts.
Similar Products Used: Nike Forged Blade, Mizuno MP-23's and MP-33's
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Review Date January 24, 2008
Overall Rating 5 of 5
Value Rating 5 of 5
Reviewed by: Rob(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Cleveland CG1
Summary: These are probably the best blades out there.They are so easy to work and when you hit them out of the middle they are pure.You have to be a decent ball striker to hit these though as the sweetspot is so small.On miss hits you can lose up to 20 meters distance.On well struck shots you also lose about 5 meters distance with these than cavity backs but overall the distance loss is worth it because it makes up in accuracy.Also they seem to get more backspin than other blades i've tried.I have hit 695mb's before and these are way better as they are easier to work and also they have a better ball flight, the clevelands have a more penetrating ball flight but the 695's seem to go straight up.I would reccommend these irons to anyone who is a decent golfer.
Customer Service: Not needed.
Similar Products Used: titleist 981sl,titleist 695mb
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
(78 views/week)
5 of 5
5 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
