Login |  Register Golfreview logo

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

  >>Reviews >> Balls >>

Bridgestone e5

Bridgestone e5


Description
  • Unique 2-piece urethane cover construction
  • New large kinetic energy core
  • ...
More [+]
Read the Reviews >>     Write a Review >>    


Buy It Here
Knetgolf.com


Buy It Here
Used Golf Ball Deals



Review Options:  Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating  | View All

Reviews 1 - 5 (35 Reviews Total) | Next 5

Review Date
November 1, 2009

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: golfer7890 ,  Shoots in the 90s

Model Reviewed:
E5+

Summary:
Good ball for the price. This ball feels firm yet soft, definitely not a rock as a previous reviewer has stated. Construction is two-piece with a urethane cover. Straight off the tee, and responsive for the short game. Durability is above average. I enjoy playing the E5+. Bridgestone offers the best balls for the mid-range category.

Customer Service:
N/A

Similar Products Used:
NXT Tour, Hx Hot/Hot Bite, Burner TP LDP. ProV1x, Srixon, Tour ix.


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Review Date
August 7, 2009

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: don ,  Shoots in the 90s

Model Reviewed:
bridgestone e5

Summary:
Have been playing the e6 and decided to try
the e5. After playing the e6 the e5 feels
like a rock. I like a soft feel and if you
do also, the e5 is NOT SOFT.

Similar Products Used:
bridgestone treosoft


Buy

Review Date
October 26, 2008

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 2 votes

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: Norge ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
Bridestone E5

Summary:
Really disappointed. I've gone through 3 dozen and have given up. For the price, there are alot of other better choices out there. It's just another 2 piece but with a urethane cover. I guess I beleived that you can have the consistency of a 2 piece with added spin control around the greens.
Its average on drives and irons. There is some check on short irons but it rates poor on pitch/chips. Putting was where the E5 was a strong performer. Really good feedback off the putter and consistent roll. Sorry, but IMO they should have called it the Bridgestone EEEEWWWW 5.

Similar Products Used:
Lots


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Review Date
July 21, 2008

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5, 2 votes

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: PI5Seeker ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
Bridgestone E5+

Summary:
I used the Wilson TX4 PRO for the front 9 today and could barely break 50. I hit a slice on every tee shot, which is not my normal shot shape. I also had trouble with it around the greens because it was TOO soft. I changed to the Bridgestone e5+ for the back 9 and played great. My trajectory was much higher and straighter. It felt soft on all shots, firm off the putter which I like and it spins pretty good for a budget ball. I tried the E6 last season and didn't like the ball flight but this new E5+ was fantastic for my game. Needless to say I shot a 41, including a terrible final 2 holes, bogey and double.

Similar Products Used:
Wilson TX4 Pro, Top Flite Gamer, Nike Ta2 SPN, Precept Laddie Xtreme and MC Lady, Bridgestone E6, Titleist NXT Tour


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Review Date
June 24, 2008

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 3 votes

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: 4setsofirons ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
e5+

Summary:
I have now played three rounds of golf with E5+ on two courses and here’s my observation. I’m not a power hitter and I’m only guessing that my swing speed is medium (maybe around 85mph with a driver). These balls are seriously long for my swing speed. Longer than ProV1, NXT Tour and HX Tour; just shy of the TP Black but this ball is straighter with a driver. Although it has urethane cover and may spin like a 3-piece tour ball, it doesn't stop like one. Even though it has a measured spin rate higher than TP Black/HX Tour/ProV1 according to the Feb 08 issue of Golf Magazine, I can tell you that it doesn’t have the same hop-n-stop ability on the green. I believe that maybe it’s down to the fact that the cover is quite hard (hence harder wearing = good:-) and bounces a bit more. It’s longer and spinier than NXT Tour - a fairer like-4-like comparison I reckon. As with the NXT Tour, I tend to pitch ten yards in front of the pin and expect a small amount of roll forward. Off the face of the driver it feels light and responsive. It putts nicely too with nice roll but not too sticky as with some tour balls. On the whole it has a nice combination of distance and control, albeit lesser of the latter. However for my level, it’s the right combination, for the time being, as I need the distance and not yet ready to attack the green expecting a spin back. Since it’s cheaper and performs better than NXT Tour, definitely 5 stars for value, 4.5 for performance and durability. Very highly recommended for mid handicappers.

Similar Products Used:
ProV1, NXT Tour, HX Tour/Tour56, Nike Platinum, TP Black, AD333.


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Reviews 1 - 5 (35 Reviews Total) | Next 5

Review Options:  Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating  | View All




Will Michelle Wie (18) win a Major before she's 20?

  Yes
  No
  Maybe

View Results
Advertise With Us | About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use The ConsumerREVIEW.com Network
 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda      RSS Feed