Login |  Register Golfreview logo

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

  >>Reviews >> Irons >>

Cleveland CG4

Cleveland CG4


Description
  • Cavity back design
  • Lower and deeper center of gravity
  • ...
More [+]


More Products from Cleveland  >>
Read the Reviews >>     Write a Review >>    


Buy It Here
GolfSmith



Review Options:  Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating  | View All

Reviews 1 - 5 (67 Reviews Total) | Next 5

Review Date
July 17, 2009

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
3.67 of 5, 3 votes

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: BrannerLitten ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
Cleveland CG4

Summary:
I had the money and time last year to try out nine different sets of clubs. The seven included:Nike Ignite, Titleist AP2, Titleist AP1, Cleveland CG1 Black Pearl, Nike CCi, Callaway x-22 tour, Taylormade CGB Max, Ping G10, and Cleveland CG4. I really enjoyed it. My wife was like "ANOTHER SET OF GOLF CLUBS!" every time one would show up. I don't claim to be the greatest golfer(atleast when I am sober), but this was a fun experience. This is how I rated them.
#1- CG4
#2- Ping G10
#3- CGB Max
#4- AP2
#5- CCi
#6- X-22 tour
#7- AP1
#8- Ignite
Tied at #8- CG1

Customer Service:
I can't say enough about the people at Cleveland.

Similar Products Used:
All listed above. Plus previous clubs which include Macgregor Reverse Draft and Callaway x-18.


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Review Date
March 16, 2009

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5, 3 votes

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: Lefty ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
Cleveland CG4

Summary:
I owned the Cleveland VAS 792 with composite-R shafts, TA3 with True Temper steel R, and now the CG4 True Temper steel R. I have always used Cleveland for their lower price and higher quality.

VAS 792 best irons ever made by any maker. Dead straight and longer than any other irons on the market. Sad they are no longer manufactured.

TA3 good looking clubs and as good as anything else on the market but not as good as the VAS 792. Almost as long though. Easier to work with than the VAS 792 under tough conditions, especially out of bunkers.

CG4 was not an easy switch from the TA3 and took some time to get used to. Definitely softer to hit than the TA3. Not as long though as either the VAS 792 or the TA3. CG4 top line is thicker than usual for Cleveland, again needing to get used to it. Offset looks minimal, even compared to the TA3. Still work in progress but pleased with the CG4 performance overall.

CG4 main characters would be soft as hell off the face, easy to work with, and a thick top line that looks like it wants to punish the ball.








Buy

Review Date
February 14, 2009

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: BigSkyGolfer143 ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
Cleveland CG4 Irons

Summary:
I have played golf virtually all my life and these are the best clubs i have ever swung. They have a unique crispness to each shot, and to be honest they look sweet in a bag. My iron play has always been decent but i am now able to attack pins instead of simply hitting at a green. A great investment to any golfers game!


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Review Date
February 11, 2009

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
2.00 of 5, 1 votes

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: nadasii ,  Shoots in the 90s

Model Reviewed:
cg4 tour

Summary:
i played old callaway big bertha golds and ben hogan blades before these. and found these clevelands to be between the berthas and blades in terms of forgiveness.
the head is quite compact and top line is not very thick so it look good at address, the feel of the head is buttery soft at impact, but when played with softer balls like pro-vs it feels a bit mushy, distance is further reduced on what i find is not a particularly long hitting iron set. slightly harder balls gives a very much improved distance and strikes feels more sharp.
shot shaping is possible with the tour model i find the fade easier to play but both is possible, however normally i take one club up if i play a fade around a tree, i find i need to take two up with the cg4, i think the angle of the clubs is a bit higher than normal, but thats not a problem once you know your yardage with them.
all in all, im very pleased with these irons. they have very soft feel allowing you to add spin to shots and looks fantastic. i feel very comfortable playing these while i try to lower my handicap. i got these for £140 near new 3-p so i got them cheapish, with reg steel lite shaft, all standard . bargain

Customer Service:
na

Similar Products Used:
r7 berthas hogan blades


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Review Date
November 19, 2008

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5, 2 votes

Rate this review?

Reviewed by: fadm ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
CG 4

Summary:
When I purchased these clubs (April 2008) my hdpc was 15. With a little change on my swing and these clubs, now I have 11.
These clubs are the best!


Buy
Would you like to Comment?
Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Reviews 1 - 5 (67 Reviews Total) | Next 5

Review Options:  Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating  | View All




Will Michelle Wie (18) win a Major before she's 20?

  Yes
  No
  Maybe

View Results
Advertise With Us | About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use The ConsumerREVIEW.com Network
 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda      RSS Feed