Ping i15 Irons

Ping i15 Irons 

DESCRIPTION

In the design of the i15 iron, PING engineers focused on the better player who prefers an iron set that offers the control to play a variety of shots. Created as a progressive set, the longer irons are larger for more forgiveness. The mid- and short-irons are smaller to ensure workability and control on approach shots.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 33  
[Apr 01, 2024]
nadya


Strength:

This article is truly amazing! I am very impressed with the depth of insight presented and the clear and easy-to-understand writing style. The content of the article is very relevant and informative, providing a deeper understanding of the topic discussed. In addition, the analysis presented is also very profound and provides a different perspective. Thanks to the writer for the effort and dedication in presenting high-quality articles like this. I am looking forward to reading more articles! Read more on: Arta4d

Weakness:

. . .

OVERALL
RATING
5
[Jan 01, 2024]
minami


Strength:

Wonderful Article!
tstoto
tstoto
tstoto
tstoto

Weakness:

. . .

OVERALL
RATING
5
[Dec 24, 2023]
arissaaqila


Strength:

Every year, on Tstoto birthday, a large charity event is held to raise funds for the social projects that the foundation continues to pursue. This event is not only a warning, but also a concrete step to continue the trail of goodness left by tstoto

Weakness:

No weaknesses. All very good.

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Jan 10, 2014]
el Bruce
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Ping i15 Irons

These irons are juuuuuust right. Not too big, not too small. Not too much offset, not too little. Progressive head size, but nothing obnoxious either.

They're an outstanding combination of i5 and i20 - the best bits of each. More compact and better turf interaction than i20. Like i5's with progressive head size and more forgiveness on the toe.

Customer Service

PING is best.

Similar Products Used:

Callaway x22; Callaway BB, Taylormade RAC, R7, R9; Wilson FG Tour & FG17 (sweet), Ci7/Di9, PING G5, G15, G20, i5, i15, i20.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 14, 2012]
bossanovawitcha
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: PING i15 Irons

These are fantastic irons. Progressive set improves forgiveness and trajectory with longer irons, but keeps the shorter irons tidy enough for control and scoring (plenty forgiving to boot). The previous poster saying the irons were a 'club shorter than his mizzies' probably fit for the wrong shaft. I've hit the MP's and these are longer.. I get a club more out of PING CFS and AWT shafts than I do the KBS Tours as well. But more important than length - is consistency. Nobody beats PING in consistent distance.

These are much better than the i10's. They're more like i5's with the progressive head size, on top of new goodies like the tungsten sole.

i20's are amazing too - but these can be had 1/3 the price of i20's new on fleabay right now.

Customer Service

Nobody beats PING customer service.

Similar Products Used:

Wilson FG Tour
Callaway X-22, Bertha, X-Forged
PING i5, G5, G15, G20
Cleveland TA, CG
Taylormade R7, Burner

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 16, 2012]
par4par
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Ping i15

Easy to hit but not for me. Picked up a set of used black dot with KBS Tour Stiff shafts. Was hitting Mizuno MP52's, looking for more forgiveness. Absolutely no feel and 1 club shorter than my Mizuno's. Lots of great reviews posted but again, not for me....back to my mizzy's until something else catches my eye.

Customer Service

N/A

Similar Products Used:

Titleist 762
Mizuno MP52

OVERALL
RATING
2
VALUE
RATING
2
[Apr 08, 2012]
John Patterson
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: I 15

Was hitting X-20 tours, this is the best set of irons I have played in over 40 years of golf, incredible feel and actually get better distance and accuracy than the X-20. Highly recommend a trip to your local pro or golf shop and hit these irons.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Aug 29, 2011]
pingman
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed: i-15 irons

These are not the longest irons (high ball flight with graphite shafts)- but They are very accurate and have amazingly consistent distance control. The short irons are deadly accurate, especially the "U" wedge. The finish is durable and looks good in the bag. These are PERFECT for players who hit it well- and don't mind admitting that they need a little help on toe hits or thinned shots from time to time. Having played all types of clubs over the years, I have found that every club feels good when you pure it, and every club gives you feedback of some sort if you miss it. Those "scratch" posters who drone on about needing feedback... why? If you pure it every time you shouldn't need feedback. If you call these clubs sloppy or harsh then you must have mis-hit a few.. so which one is it? Most 15 HC and down could handle these clubs just fine- and as it is with all clubs: if they work for you, that is all that matters.

Customer Service

good- small delay in getting one club- but shipped to rural area quickly

Similar Products Used:

Ping eye 2 - G2 - Cally x-18 - TM R7

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jul 02, 2011]
cjg
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: i15

I have just recently started playing again after a 2 year absence and was having trouble hitting my Mizuno forged irons consistently. So I went out looking for something a bit easier to hit that would still suit me after I get back up to speed(used to be a 6 handicap). These clubs were recommended to me by the local golf shop, and it was a great recommendation. I have hit these irons beyond my expectations since the first time I stepped on the course with them.

I shot a respectable 86 my first time out with these irons in spite of missing nearly every fairway all day long. And in spite of missing a lot of greens as well. Not because I wasn't hitting my irons well, but because I was hitting them 5-10 yards longer than I'm accustomed to and was missing greens long. Now that I am getting used to the yardage that I'm hitting these irons, I'm making more greens than I have in a long time. Even mis-hits go fairly straight and don't lose much distance. And there is still enough feedback to feel where I hit the ball on the clubface, without being painful. In one case in particular, I hit a 3 iron badly off the toe and was surprised to find that it still went 185 and barely missed the right side of the green. With my Mizunos, a mis-hit of that magnitude would have went maybe 170 and MUCH farther right, and would have been painful as well.

All in all, I couldn't be happier with these irons. They're long, straight(while still having some workability), and have good feedback without being harsh. I would highly recommend these to the mid to low handicap player who wants something fairly easy to hit well but doesn't want a lot of offset. And now that the price has been lowered on these they are a good value as well.

Customer Service

Haven't used.

Similar Products Used:

Mizuno MX-20, MP-32, & MP-60
Callaway X-16 Pro
Ping i3+
Taylor Made Burner 2
Titleist AP1

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 19, 2011]
Jim Thoms
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed: PING i15

I would love to review my new clubs, but after ordering them on April 20th, I still haven't received them. I called PING, got the runaround, someting about the wedges being backordered. If you need new irons quick, go with a different barand.

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
Showing 1-10 of 33  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

golfreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com