Reviewed by: Adhir(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: TM RAC OS2
Summary: Quite nice actually, after using a lot of different clubs on the range finally bought these irons 4-sw. The are quite good for the price, very forigiving and good distance too. I can hit a 4i to about 190 yds. For some one who has a moderately consistent swing these are a good buy. Only the grips are a bit slippery.
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Review Date September 11, 2009
Overall Rating 5 of 5
Value Rating 5 of 5
Visitors rate this review 3.43 of 5,
7.00 votes
Reviewed by: Frankie(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Taylor Made RAC OS2
Summary: Thought i needed a change so off i went to American Golf to try out some clubs, Have been playing with Ping eye 2 good club but really old. Tryed out the Burner Plus really liked them, then a friend gave me a set of OS2 what a difference, knocked 8 shots off my game in 6 weeks they are just easy to hit, and even when you miss hit the ball just carries a great distance. Shafts are good but the grips feel slimey, so i changed the grips after a couple of weeks. I would recommend to mid-high handicapers.
Customer Service: N/A
Similar Products Used: Ping Eye 2
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Summary: the rac os are my first set of clubs. I like them because its all ive shot. Love my pw hit 140-160 my 8 175-180 my 3 iron is hard to hit but if i do 220+ i guess those are good numbers for a rookie.
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Summary: These clubs are the most inconsistent irons I have ever hit in my life. You cant beat the price but sometimes, as shown evident here, you get what you pay for. I try my friend's Callaway iron and i get at least 15 if not 20 more yards for each club. I am limited to either a slice or a straight shot with these clubs as their workability is limited. I would HEAVILY suggest looking into Callaway X-18s or even the X-20s. If you're looking for a good deal, these are the way to go but if you are a competitive golfer like me, you will be in the market for new clubs soon after.
Customer Service: Excellent.
Similar Products Used: Callaway X-18 and X-20
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Review Date April 22, 2009
Overall Rating 5 of 5
Value Rating 5 of 5
Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
1.00 votes
Reviewed by: Rung Donald(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: TM RAC OS2
Summary: These irons are great especially for players who seek for game improvement as a priority. My only warning is that these irons are created as draw biased and so those who has already had a draw flight are likely to find the ball end up at the left side of the green or geenside bunker when aiming straight. You can notice from plenty of offset RAC OS2 have. My solution is I still keep 3-9 irons, whick I occasionally open the club face at impact, while replacing PW-SW with less offset wedge (cleveland wedge). Anyway, this iron set is still great in term of forgiving. Imagine you hit couple of inches behind the ball but don't lose much distance. Moreover, in term of distance, it is so amazing that I gain a lot distance with such high ball fligt (7 iron - 165 yards, not too bad isn't it?). The last thing I love RAC OS2 is they have very soft and spring-liked club face. I have no worry about any pain even though I sometimes miss hit at the ground. The club face can absorb the vibration quite a lot before reaching my hands and arms. If you are mid to high handicaper, I strongly recommend RAC OS2 as weopen to beat your pals next round.
Similar Products Used: Callaway X-12, Mizuno Mx-25
Would you like to Comment? Join GolfReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
5 of 5
5 of 5
4 of 5
4 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
