|
Reviews 1 - 5 (17 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 5 |
Review Date
February 16, 2012 Overall Rating
 5 of 5
Value Rating
 4 of 5
|
|  |
Reviewed by: kevntri
,
Shoots in the 70s Model Reviewed:
Tour Burner Summary:
I played Mizuno blades for the last 6-7 years. I hurt my neck and had to take two years off....I picked up a used set or Tour Burners....
I took them to the range this past week. Remember this was the first swings in two years. All I can say is WOW.... Very nice clubs. They go very high with the "S" taylor shaft. I was able to work the ball both ways. I think these are a good fit for all levels.
|
|
 |
Review Date
February 5, 2012 Overall Rating
 4 of 5
Value Rating
4 of 5
|
| |
Reviewed by: ebenny 10
,
Shoots in the 80s Model Reviewed:
Taylor Made Burner 1.0 Summary:
The TM burner 1.0 was an ungrade from Adams A3OS. Mine are stiff steel shafts and are easy to hit, have good feel and forgiving and great on the distance ego. These clubs are best suited for 80-90+ handicap players and buyer beware if you are in the area of 5'-6" like me with a recommended fitting of -1/4" shafts these are too long and will dig. Probably not a suitable club for an upwright swing plane. Now that they have been properly fitted they don't dig as much and are realy consistent with distance. They will stay in my bag for a couple of years yet. Customer Service:
Didn't have to use. Similar Products Used:
None
|
|
|
Review Date
October 24, 2011 Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
 5 of 5
Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1.00 votes
|
| |
Reviewed by: FHaton
,
Shoots in the 90s Model Reviewed:
TaylorMade Tour Burner Irons Summary:
Just won used TM Tour Burner Irons on eBay from 3Balls.com. Clubs arrived in excellent shape, just needed new grips. Installed Golf Pride Tour Wrap grips, and took them to the course to play them. Hit them on the range prior to the round, and loved them. Will bein my bag probably as long as my old Pinseekers. Like the look, feel, and distance is awesome! Customer Service:
N/A Similar Products Used:
TaylorMade RAC OS 2 Irons, Pinseeker TPW-III Irons
|
|
|
Review Date
September 5, 2011 Overall Rating
 2 of 5
Value Rating
 1 of 5
|
| |
Reviewed by: Jeff Shafer(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 80s Model Reviewed:
Taylormade Burner 2.0 Irons Summary:
In Spring of 2011 I decided to modernize my bag. The Burner 2.0 was recommended to me because of the strong lofts, and distance was something I felt I could use. But I didn't do my homework before being fitted for these irons and later learned the standard swingweights are D3.5 (+/1 one SW). Though mine were ordered 1/4" short the SW's came in at D4-D5. TM's responses to my inquiries about the high swingweights were disappointing. I've tried to fight through my problems with these irons and now feel I've wasted my entire 2011 season. Not to mention the $700 I wasted. Customer Service:
Not very good. Emails didn't address my questions and when I finally spoke to a person he told me I shouldn't send the irons back because there probably wasn't anything they could do for me since the SW's were within tolerance.
|
|
|
Review Date
July 1, 2011 Overall Rating
2 of 5
Value Rating
 2 of 5
|
| |
Reviewed by: smokehouse
,
Shoots in the 70s Model Reviewed:
Burner 1.0 Irons Summary:
I bought the new Burner 1.0 irons with the steel uniflex shafts about six months ago. I'm now in my fifties and the days of playing stiff shafts are behind me I'm afraid. The uniflex shafts feel more like stiff than uniflex to me, and just the overall quality of these clubs is less than what I've seen from Taylormade in the past. It just doesn't feel like I'm swinging a quality club when I play these. Maybe it's just be but I think this is why you now see them for such low prices on Ebay. Not Taylormade's best effort in my humble opinion.
|
|
|
Comments
