Titleist Forged Stainless 704.CB Irons
Titleist Forged Stainless 704.CB Irons
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 01, 2024]
minami
|
[Dec 30, 2023]
Aeera
Strength:
ขอบคุณสำหรับข้อมูล บทความนี้มีประโยชน์มาก! tstoto Weakness:
. . . |
[Dec 22, 2023]
arissaaqila
Strength:
Behind all his achievements and success, tstoto Weakness:
No weaknesses. All very good. Purchased: New
|
[Sep 11, 2021]
boorish1973
Strength:
These require a good swing and then the club does the rest!!! They are very accurate and have a great trajectory. | Stretch Ceilings Phoenix Weakness:
none so far Purchased: New
|
[Jan 31, 2012]
James A golfer
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
All clubs
I seldom. if every come across these types of review but when I do Im always amazed at some of the claptrap spoken. Bobby Jones's clubs were not matched in any way and certainly were not forgiving, the sweet spot about the size of a ten pence and placed differently in every club. My advice for all you who love to carp on about modern clubs is to learn how to swing the things properly. |
[Oct 09, 2010]
yoyoma
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 704CB
I've tried dozens of sets and keep going back to these irons. I can work the ball and love the forgiveness and feel. I even tried the new AP2 and while they were 1/2 club longer I just did not hae the accuracy of the 704; and that's what the game is all about. Perhaps Titleist's most underated iron. |
[Jun 05, 2010]
Longpar5
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 704.cb
i have had these since 2007. i quit playing 2 years ago and was using callaway x-20 tour's when i quit and these were in my closet. just got back from golf galaxy and the range after having them bent 2* up and 2*strong. i cannot stress how important it is to have your loft and lie checked when you own a set of this type of clubs. it is unreal the difference in these. i used to honestly think that i couldn't hit them, and they were very unforgiving, and very short. come to find out, the lofts had been bent 2* weak by someone before me (bought on ebay, a leftie). so they had to bend some of them 4* to get to 2* strong. on the simulator, i flew a 6 iron 209 (i know, simulator lies), and on the range, 6 iron was a solid, and consistent 180-185. Mis-hits are not forgiving as far as distance, but do go very straight. i would say on the toe i lost 20-25 yards, and on the heel 10-15. but the mis-hits just off center maybe lost 5. these are renewed in my mind, and i love the way a sweet shot feels like warm apple pie. my advice for these is plenyt...
Customer Service no idea Similar Products Used: callaway x-20 tour (nice, long, but clunky/big), cleveland ta-5 (hook machines), cleveland ta2 (hated), mizuno mx23 (awesome)
|
[Dec 22, 2009]
Mark Goodman
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 704 cb
Just purchased a second hand set, and wow what a great set of irons- easy to hit a very consistant.
Similar Products Used: Taylormade LT |
[Mar 18, 2009]
socal ladygolfer
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 704 CB
I own a set 3-PW with TT Gold R flex shafts, of these for over 3 yrs and I love their feel and response to the well hit shots as well as the immediate feedback, they give in missed hits. |
[Oct 03, 2008]
Glencap1
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 704.CB
For a decent ball striker these play with a good deal of forgiveness. Don't shy away because they are Titleist. They're no nonsense golf tools that will last a long time and allow you to have a solid iron game. And now some really nice sets can be had for a pittance compared to new clubs. Don't be trapped into soft carbon steel forged because they have that "buttery" feel. They're also as soft as butter and you'll see them dinged up from errant strikes and bag chatter in just a few seasons. That may be OK for pros that are furnished with multiple sets over a year but not for the amateur spending his own money. Customer Service NA Similar Products Used: Mizuno MP-57, MP-60, MX-25, MX-900 |