|
Reviews 1 - 2 (2 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Date
July 26, 2010 Overall Rating
 4 of 5
Value Rating
 5 of 5
|
|  |
Reviewed by: jetdriver
,
Shoots in the 80s Model Reviewed:
Haig Ultra 71-72 (2-8), 73-74 (9-PW Summary:
I have a modified combo set of these as follows: '71-'72 (2-8), '73-'74 (9-PW. The 2-8 are just the sweetest blades. They have great soft feel. They are the ones with A UN-circled shield/logo towards the toe. The 9-PW are a bit Hard and unlike the others they have a circled shield logo. Big difference between the two. I give the former a "5" and the latter a "4". The Uncircled '71/'72 models would make a good backup for Hogan blades. Similar Products Used:
Hogan blades
|
|
 |
Review Date
May 11, 2007 Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
|
| |
Reviewed by: Golfmage
,
Shoots in the 80s Model Reviewed:
Cleveland HiBore Hybrid Summary:
These are good clubs for high handicappers, and they would deserve the highest rating for golfers with 20+ handicaps. Since the average handicap is around 16, I would not recommend these irons for the average golfer. I may have purchased the wrong shafts (stock True Temper), so my feedback should be taking with that caveat.
I can agree with other reviewers who said that the head configuration (Distance Driven Geometry) does make the longer irons VERY EASY to hit. I also agree that these are excellent "game improvement" category clubs. It's just that for anyone who considers themself an "average" golfer, you should probably worry about the club shaft fitting, rather than any unorthodox head design to improve your game. Customer Service:
Not needed. Similar Products Used:
Old Big Bertha Irons
|
|
|
Comments
