|
Reviews 1 - 4 (4 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Date
November 26, 2007 Overall Rating
 5 of 5
Value Rating
 5 of 5
|
|  |
Reviewed by: mr_smith
,
Shoots in the 90s Model Reviewed:
Cleveland putter Summary:
With this putter my lag-putting's gotten so much better. My buddies even commented on it. Classic design and feel make this one a keeper!
|
|
 |
Review Date
September 17, 2007 Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
|
| |
Reviewed by: Rich Lavigne(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 80s Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Designed By Ben Crenshaw Summary:
I bought this putter circa 1994 when I was a 6 handicap high school golfer. I had used several different putters previously, including a Ram Zebra and Titliest Bullseye, but knew the second i tried this putter at the golf store that this was going to be the putter for me. The balance is perfect, and feel is always true. It doesn't have all of the high-tech features like a milled face, or 2/3 ball alignment aids, but decades of great puuters can't be wrong. They've all used a smiliar style blade. It seems as if this puuter was actually made by Cleveland for several years under a few different names. I bought mine in 1994 and it says, "designed by Ben Crenshaw" on the bottom. In 1995, Corey Pavin used this putter during his win at the US Open. At the time, Corey Pavin was a Cleveland golfer and this putter was subsequently re-released with the words, "designed by Corey Pavin" on the bottom.
During college I gave up playing, but have recently been re-energized. I still have my classic blade, but would love to get a new one....if you find one of these hang onto it. You won't regret it. Customer Service:
Never had to deal with them. Similar Products Used:
Titliest Bullseye
|
|
|
Review Date
December 8, 2006 Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
|
| |
Reviewed by: bringbackthebalata
,
Shoots in the 70s Model Reviewed:
Cleveland "designed by" Summary:
I played the Cleveland for a couple years and then switched to the Wilson 8802 (another blade style). I thought the forged blade of the Wilson would have a better feel. I was wrong. I get better feedback from the Cleveland. The Cleveland also seems to set up more easily and squarely behind the ball. The Wilson seemed to want to "toe in" when resting on the ground.
The benefit of a blade putter is feel. Not just for distance but also for getting a sense of how the club head is oriented during the stroke. The toe heavy design makes it easier to sense when the putter head is off line. I've tried every blade model I seen in golf stores and the Cleveland is the best of the blades.
|
|
|
Review Date
July 25, 2004 Overall Rating
 4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes
|
| |
Reviewed by: teddy_g
,
Shoots in the 80s Model Reviewed:
Cleveland-designed by putter Summary:
This is an extremely good putter with great feel and a nice elegant,classic design.I would recommend this putter for a player who relies on feel as opposed to someone who uses guides or lines on the putterhead to line up putts. Customer Service:
n/a Similar Products Used:
Wilson 8802
|
|
|
