Nike Air Max Press

Review Date
July 27, 2005

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 1 votes

Review Date
July 31, 2003

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 1 of 5

Reviewed by: YTS(Unregistered User) ,  Shoots in the 90s

Model Reviewed:
Nike TW Last

Summary:
You guys are too generous with your ratings for Nike shoes! In a nutshell, they suck big time. I will give them 9/10 for design, maybe 5/10 for comfort but for durability, only 1/10. Ok I bought the TW series with Goretex thinking,"hmm... the last pair of Nike I had was the low end pair, that explains its lack of durability" Well, surprise surprise, the TW version did not fare any better... the sole came off, i sent it for stiching. Then the sole cracked and the spikes dropped off!!! unbelievable. Plus their waterproofing on the leather sucks too. Now that TW is not using their driver, I guess they should just stick to making golf socks, pants and shirts. Forget about equipment and shoes! Everytime I know a friend of mine who is in the market for a pair of golf shoes, i always tell them to give Nike a MISS. Speaking from experience Lah....

Customer Service:
Unfortunately, I stay in Singapore, if I am in States, I might get some kind of recourse...

Similar Products Used:
Footjoy Contour - Absolutely comfortable and the spikes do not trap too much turf. I am a FJ convert for now.

Review Date
February 18, 2002

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 2 votes

Reviewed by: cas21(Unregistered User) ,  Shoots in the 90s

Model Reviewed:
Nike Air Zoom Tradition 2

Summary:
I got these shoes for Christmas and they are the first pair of golf shoes I have ever owned. I tried a few pairs before I recieved these including a pair of Etonics and the Nike Course Air. I found those two in particular to be very tight on the feet. The Air Zooms on the other hand were perfect. I have used these for every round of golf I have played this summer (I play at least once a week) and have found them to be very easy on the feet. The q lok soft spikes provide sufficient grip on all surfaces and are a snap to remove. They are very comfortable shoes and have proved to be great in all sorts of conditions including rain. They are also quite good looking to boot. I have a brown pair which look great. So far they are holding up quite nicely and the only signs of trouble are some scratches on the toe of the shoe. I am even surprised that the thin flimsy looking laces have held up. I have no problem recommending these shoes for those tackling 18 holes of golf.

Review Date
November 21, 2001

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Reviewed by: joef118(Unregistered User) ,  Shoots in the 80s , from honolulu

Model Reviewed:
Air Max

Summary:
Great comfortable shoes for walking but they leaked after 6 months. I returned them thinking it was a defect and upgraded to the Air Press with a 2 years waterproof warranty. Same thing, it leaked after 7 months.

Similar Products Used:
None

Review Date
October 11, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Reviewed by: sgd26(Unregistered User) ,  Shoots in the 80s

Model Reviewed:
Nike Course Air Tour TW

Summary:
These replaced a pair of DryJoys that leaked prematurely. FJ was reluctant to replace them, so I vote with my wallet. The TWs are great. They are extremely comfortable and look like pair of dress shoes. I purchase the wing tip (black) and split toe (brown). After these, I will never buy a pair of FJs again.

Customer Service:
I have not used customer service

Similar Products Used:
None