  | |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating
| View All |
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (13 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 5 |
Review Date
October 25, 2009 Overall Rating
 3 of 5
Value Rating
 2 of 5
|
| |
Reviewed by: J Conant(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 80s Model Reviewed:
Ping i10 Summary:
My Coach recommended these to me for my junior year, and I think he knows what he's talking about so i went out and bought them. I ended up being pretty disappointed. You really can't work the ball at all with these irons. I lost about 10 yards off every iron shot I had from my previous year. I gave it a 3 because I could tell how forgiving they were. Working the ball just isn't easy or even possible with these. long story short, im getting new clubs. Similar Products Used:
Ping eye 2
|
|  |
Review Date
September 25, 2009 Overall Rating
 5 of 5
Value Rating
 5 of 5
Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
3 votes
|
| |
Reviewed by: holehigh1(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 70s Model Reviewed:
ping i10 Summary:
Let's all hope that Jimmy didn't strain his arm too badly patting himself on the back. It would be difficult to shoot all those 60's with a strained arm
|
| |
Review Date
September 20, 2009 Overall Rating
3 of 5
Value Rating
 3 of 5
Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5,
7 votes
|
| |
Reviewed by: Jimmy(Unregistered User)
,
Scratch Golfer Model Reviewed:
Ping i10 Summary:
I'm probably the best golfer in this forum so you might want to take a good look at my reivew of the Ping i10 irons. The Ping Eye 2 is a better iron and can be had for hundreds less. The AWT stiff shaft is sluggish and unresponsive. It feels like the ball lags on the face of the club. I only shot a 71 that day and for me that's a bad score. I actually got less distance with the i10's than I did with my Ping Eye 2 which can ony be explained by the shaft. These irons are not good enough for my skill level.
|
| |
Review Date
September 14, 2009 Overall Rating
3 of 5
Value Rating
3 of 5
Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
3 votes
|
| |
Reviewed by: morphd(Unregistered User)
,
Shoots in the 90s Model Reviewed:
Ping i10 irons Summary:
I bought this irons with high hopes of them being perfect since they were matched to my swing etc. I was very dissapointed. I carry an 18 handicap (bogey golf) and had Taylormade RAC OS 2 before buying these irons. I could not hit these the same way I did the Taylormades, the distances were all way off and I could not hit one green. I played them 5 times, going from a 165 7iron to missing short at 140 with these. It was just not for me. They did feel solid and when I struck the ball well I thought the ball would be too long, but it always came up short. This made my 4 iron good for about 180 yards which left me a huge gap between that and my hybred at 215. I traded them back in for newer Taylormades. I guess I am just a Taylormade guy. Maybe the new i15 will be better, seems Ping knows this is an issue with most people as their new design states distance as a newer advantage. Customer Service:
I did not use Ping customer Service, but Edwin Watts was very good. They traded me the Pings for Taylormade R7 even across. I know those are older models, but I am not much for the newest clubs out. I do my research and generally get an older club than the latest and greatest, seems a much better deal to my wallet. Similar Products Used:
Taylormade RAC OS 2 and now Taylormade R7
|
| |
Review Date
June 21, 2009 Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5,
4 votes
|
| |
Reviewed by: PingCat
,
Shoots in the 70s Model Reviewed:
Ping i10 irons Summary:
After playing blades and forged Mizunos my whole life, and never being a Ping guy - the i5's caught my eye, but I waited and pulled the trigger when the i10s came out. And I'm thrilled with these irons and won't be getting new irons for a long time. For a decent player, the Rac LTs were great, MP-60's were better, but the i10s are perfect. The small head, minimal offset and small cavity-back encourage attack mode confidence with every club. However -- as I've read others say, I strongly feel the AWT shafts are a bit on the stiff, non-responsive side and I had an expereinced club builder put Dynamic Gold shafts in them and now they are all like accurate little rocket launchers with plenty of feel. I hope my new heroes at Ping don't excommunicate me for this. :-) Customer Service:
Ping's customer service is so good it's not even fair to compare with any other manufacturer. I ordered my standard length blue dots with stiff AWT shafts on a Sunday, and had them in my hands that Thursday. Built, inspected by at least 10 quality control people and delivered from Phoenix to Golf Galaxy in Bloomington MN in 4 days. I hope you're taking notes, One Month Mizuno! Similar Products Used:
Ping G2, TaylorMade rac LT, Mizuno MP-60.
|
| |
|
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (13 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 5 |
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating
| View All |
|
|
View Comments (2)
