This article is truly amazing! I am very impressed with the depth of insight presented and the clear and easy-to-understand writing style. The content of the article is very relevant and informative, providing a deeper understanding of the topic discussed. In addition, the analysis presented is also very profound and provides a different perspective. Thanks to the writer for the effort and dedication in presenting high-quality articles like this. I am looking forward to reading more articles! Read more on: Arta4d

` ` `

I had the TF 300 before with UST 65 Stiff flex and I cracked the clubface after a year of use. I bought the TF-360 a month ago with UST ATR 65 Stiff flex. I have nothing but praise for the TF-360. I hit it farther than before. I noticed it goes straighter and farther with a smooth swing. But I'm a natural strong hitter, so maybe I'll change the shaft to either UST 65 Stiff or Accuflex Vizion Stiff. Has any strong hitter tried this with extra stiff shaft? Please let me know. Very satisfied with this club and wouldn't trade it for the more popular brand names

I have to be honest; I was a little disappointed when I took my TF-360 to the driving range for the first time. Disappointed because my drives kept hitting the fence that was at the end of the 300-yrd range, which prevented me from knowing how long I was actually hitting the ball. I love this club! I had it made with the UST Proforce 65 stiff shaft that many other reviewers on this site have recommended. A friend of mine brought his new Ping driver along and we were able to compare the two side by side. Now to be fair his Ping is a 10* and my TF-360 is an 8*. In distance I kicked his trash! Almost every one of my drives with the TF-360 hit the back of the driving range. As for accuracy my friend did a little better than I did at first but after 10 or so drives, I was able to get use to my club and our accuracy was about the same. The sound and feel was the same between the two. There isn't much feel with either club, however both have that sweet "Tink" sound and the look of both clubs gave me a lot of confidence. Now I've read other posts that say the TF-360 makes a "Thud" sound when hit. I didn't experience that and both clubs sounded the same. As for price, well I don't think I have to tell you which one was the better value. Lets see $100 or $400, such a hard decision! Any way this club, along with my new integra VS 88 irons has made a huge difference in my game. I was hitting in the high 90's and I am now in the high 80's, which has made me a very happy golfer!

Customer Service

Clonegolfclubs.com had the best prices I could find on the Web. The customer service was very nice, but it did take over two weeks for them to get my club to me (head was out of stock).

Similar Products Used:

Taylor Made 300 series, Callaway VFT, Ping IST

Very pleased with club, did a lot of research before buying. I purchased the TF-360 with a Accuflex Vizon shaft and midsize Winn Grip. I am 58 former baseball player and found myself being out driven. Upgrade about a year ago to Cleavland Quadpro with the Titanium face and Bimatrix shaft,hit some nice drives but nothing compared to the Combination of the TF-360 with the Accuflex Vizon. The result was an increase in distance of 15 to 25 yards in the air. Do not get a lot of roll. I am hitting a 9 degree and do get boring flight. There may be better clubs out there but I have not hit them. I have found the shaft and head allow me to crank it out about 265 to 270 and stay in the fairway with a slight draw.

Customer Service

Very Good

When I joined a league that plays from the blue tees, I needed a driver that hit farther. This club fit the bill. I bought it with a Pro Forch 65 regular shaft with stiff tip. The ball jumps off the face. My shots are straight and long. A bad shot is long and just off the fairway, usually because it rolled too far. Unintentional slices and hooks are gone from my game. The best thing about this club is I can't play without being asked what kind of club it is and others want to hit it. It looks cool and hits the ball far and straight!

Similar Products Used:

none

Totally impressed. 30 yards more than my firesole because it flies straight. Very forgiving swinging smooth or swinging hard. I borrowed it for a swing during a select shot tournament and bought one the next day.

I built this with UST 65. Looks great. I hit it better than most others drivers I''ve tried. I have a slow swing speed (about 88mph). I get 240-250 when I nail it. I get 215 when I cut it. I''m happy.

Similar Products Used:

Taylor Made, Cobra, Top Flite Ti

None

None

My review is not complete, but I originally put the club together with an Orbitor shaft, but just changed to the Pro Force 65. I have not cut the shaft down so I am playing a 46 inch shaft. The tendecy is for this club not to be able to be worked fade or draw. It is pretty straight, but I am not finished tinkering with the shaft yet. I will probably cut it down to 44 1/2 and hope it will become more workable. Any suggestions from others who have the Pro Force 65?

Customer Service

Pretty good customer service, but how tough can it be to ship an unfinished product. I put the club together.

Similar Products Used:

Golfworks Vectrax

None

None

I own a TM360 and after constant calims by my friends that he TF360 was just as good for a fraction of the price, I borrowed one for one week to finally settle the issue. Both models are 9 degree shafted with proforce 75 stiff. My swing speed is 98mph. I tested them head to head at the driving range and on my local golf course and ammassed the average over 5 rounds. Here goes : Total Distance (TM 290yards, TF 280yards), Carry (TM 260 yards, TF 260 yards), Trajectory (TM high, TF slightly higher), Sound (TM "clank", TF "thud"), Feel (TM little, TF less -with both the seet spot is so big it''s hard to tell if you really "middled it"), Workability (TM little, TF less - both pretty went straight when I tried gentle fade and draw), Weight (both felt the same), Address position (identical). In summary, the TM feels and sounds more solid off the face than the TF but this did not affect the results in any noticeable way. TM was marginally longer. In general, both are great clubs to put the drive deep down the middle. I used to use "players" clubs such as the 975D (and still sometimes do when I watch the golf majors and get excited trying to copy the pro''s) but found that I sometimes got punished for the unintentional fade or draw. I decided to take the correcting qualities of this club for unintentional fades or draws over the one or two times in a round that I need to work my driver. You have to put on a pretty big hook or slice to make these thing miss the fairway which is great for consistency off the tee which has enabled me to drop my HC from 7 to 3. Overall, I still prefer the TM slightly better as it feels and sounds better to me but the results are identical. If I had to do it again I would buy the TF.

Customer Service

I had the clubs delivered to Australia which arrived 14 days from when I ordered the club. No problems wer encountered.

Similar Products Used:

Titleist 975D, Adams FC, TM360

This club is a 9* model with a stiff Bi-Matrix shaft.

Appearance: Great looks. Just as good as an OEM. Head matches perfectly with the Bi-Matrix.

Performance: Both the shaft and the head make this probably one of if not the most fogiving heads on the market. Hit it anywhere on the face and you find the fairway or just off it. Sometimes the club is just too straight, especially when you encounter a dogleg and drive it right through the bend. The only negative I can find is that the trajectory is a little low for my SS (97) with the 9* head and the Bi-Matrix shaft. But I can hit it high by just opening the face a little and playing a power fade. Overall, a great club.

Similar Products Used:

HCRII, KZG MP, KZG PFT300, ZT CJ, ZT Maxima 360