Tommy Armour Golf Silver Scot Irons
Tommy Armour Golf Silver Scot Irons
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 11, 2021]
gasielennie410j
Strength:
The silver scots have the curved topline throughout the set. This adds forgiveness on shots hit higher on the face. I feel this is the greatest design improvement over the MP-14 profile. | Hood Cleaning Detroit Weakness:
none so far Purchased: New
|
[May 03, 2018]
JonR1776
Strength:
I’m 58 & Shoot in the 80’s and high 70s on occasion now. I have Silver Scots. I was proud of them from the day I bought them new (Around 2005? ), and still use today. Always felt very confident and powerful with these clubs. I put in my practice and it pays off with these clubs like anything else I have 2-W and the weight, contour, and angles always felt great to me. Even as a two time per week golfer it’s still important to me to have the clubs fit to my height. I’ll stay with Tommy Amour clubs and plan on buying a new set in the near future. Weakness:
I don’t think there is a weakness in the club themselves. I’m 6’3 and 58 years old now and don’t have the back, power, or swing speed I used to have and these still work for my swing with a good tempo and under 100 club head speed. As mentioned by others, grips were thin when I received them but changed to other grips (small price to pay for comfort) I certainly got my money’s worth out of these clubs. When I buy again, my first look will be to Tommy Armour they are perfect for me and the price is right. Price Paid: 699+79
Purchased: New
Model Year: 2004
|
[Sep 01, 2014]
Gary Huth
Shoots in the 100s
Model Reviewed:
Silver Scott
I haven't played golf in probably 5 to 7 years. My swing is off from where it was. I have more distance than with my old clubs right out of the box. These clubs for the money were an excellent choice
Similar Products Used: My friend bought the Evo set, very nice choice also |
[Oct 08, 2011]
Rick
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Tommy Armour Forged Silverscot Blades
This is my SECOND time owning these clubs. When I first started golfing, I wanted to get a set that I would want to keep for a long time as my game got better. I bought these new and always liked the way they looked and that they were a midsize "blade". What i didnt care for was the small grips (changed them) and the high lofts of the clubs (PW was like a 47 deg) and the short shafts (I could swear they were like a 1/2 inch shorter). So unfortunately I got rid of them and played the Burner 1.0's.
Customer Service Didnt need it. Similar Products Used: Taylormade Burner 1.0 |
[May 14, 2011]
Vern Edgren
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Tommy Armour Silver Scot
What's with the grips? They're too small. No way are they a standard grip size. |
[Dec 16, 2009]
simple_golfer
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Silver Scot Blade
I have been playing with this set for over a year now and am very happy with the performance. I have the 3-PW and also purchased the GW. I used to play the Mizuno MP-14s and still consider them to be the benchmark for blade irons. In order to make this review more objective, I will focus on comparing these 2 models.
Similar Products Used: Mizuno MP-14 |
[Oct 01, 2009]
WooHooT
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Tommy Armour Silver Scot
These are hard to beat for the money. Bought them off ebay a while ago and been playing with them for about 2 seasons. Considering that they're forged, rifle-shafted, workable, and cost as much as a 2 year old set of used mizzy's, you really can't go wrong. Only thing is that the grips which are kind of on the thin side but can be easily swapped for something better. Similar Products Used: Mizuno Mp-52, Mizuno MP-62, Mizuno MP-67 |
[Oct 04, 2008]
Brent G.
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Tommy Armour Silver Scot MB
I've been wanting to blades again for a few years now after playing cast clubs for the past few years. Saw these offered for around $150 free shipping and thought I'd give them a try before I spent $1000 or more on Mizuno or Miura. Well I don't think I'm gonna rush out and spend the money on anything else.
Customer Service did not Similar Products Used: Wilson staff, Mizuno TP9, Titleist 990 |
[May 06, 2008]
powerdraw
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Silver Scot Cavity Backs
The most underrated iron out there, period. Mine have the Rifle 6.0 shafts which are excellent shafts. The frequency matching is wonderful and they are a bit softer than the DGS300's I usually use.
Customer Service Never used. Similar Products Used: Titleist 690.CB, Mizuno MP-32, Mizuno MP-30. |
[Dec 12, 2007]
Christo G.
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Tommy Armour Silver Scot Cavity Back
First of all go get them regripped! Now that you done that enjoy a pleasant round with what possible is the most under estimated Cavity Back iron on the market. These irons come with Precision Rifle Shaft that are frequency matched for each club. They are also flighted...this means you will get different tracjectories for each iron. In turn this will help you hit the long irons and stiff the short irons at the flag. These compare to the Titleist 695CB series. I know some of you are saying is he serious? Well Yea! The only difference is the price tag and your swing. I should not have even told you guys about this set. Forget the fact that you can get these FORGED irons on Ebay for under $200. Go ahead and spend the $Gazillion bucks for the other ones that won't help you hit the side of a barn. The Silver Scot CB's are forgiving with distance to match. You will be pleased with your purchase if you can find them. Remember
Customer Service Tommy Armour Golf Company has changed hands a couple of times in the past couple of years. I believe they are owned and operated by the Huffy Bike Company. What a shame...2006 they came out with the Silver Scot series(CB and MB) and now its all gimmicks and inner tubes. Get the 2006 models while you can! Similar Products Used: Titleist 695CB |