Titleist Pro V1 Balls
Titleist Pro V1 Balls
|
[Jun 26, 2001]
jake
Shoot in the 90s
junk i see why tiger and duval don't play it. |
|
[Jun 25, 2001]
jo ko
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
pro v1
wowwwwwwww good ball Customer Service no Similar Products Used: tour accuacy tw |
|
[Jun 25, 2001]
jo ko
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
pro v1
wowwwwwwww good ball Customer Service no Similar Products Used: tour accuacy tw |
|
[Jun 24, 2001]
Heath Crawford
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
pro V1 392
This ball is total crap, is in know way in the same class as the tour accuracy TW, i just dont like it, i dont get the same feeling with this ball as i do with the TW. i say dont waste your fifty dollars on an inferiour ball, go with something that works. Similar Products Used: every premium golf ball |
|
[Jun 24, 2001]
ron
Shoot in the 80s
JMJ you are exactly right. Why pay $54.00 a dozen for these balls when you can get the Nike tour accuracy which is probabaly a better ball for $40.00 a dozen. I haven't tried the TW's yet but the regular tour accuracy's are long off the driver if you have a fast swingspeed.The Nike's also spin more and they hold their line in windy conditions too. |
|
[Jun 23, 2001]
JMJ
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist Pro V1
Let be logical, shall we!!! The Titleist Pro V1 are basically Distance Balls with a Friction cover. I bet alot of you dummies pay this price because of the Titleist name a marketing scheme. $ucker$. I outdrove the Pro V1 my friend was using and he hits 310 yrd drives using a Balata Ball 100 Compression that cost $23 dollars less and spun it back from the rough and green about 10 - 15. This is Titleist's weak attempt to match the Nike Tour Accuracy that offers way more for way less. Now I see why Pros are switching to it. I dont need the $50 Titleist Pro V1 to drive 320 yards and bite on slippery greens, DO YOU? Customer Service Stop deleting my reviews....A$$H0L3$ Similar Products Used: Footballs, Basketballs, Ping Pong Balls, Marbles and Baseballs... |
|
[Jun 23, 2001]
xgnc
Shoot in the 80s
this balls sucks compared to the tour accuracy. The prov1 ballons off the short irons |
|
[Jun 23, 2001]
Rich Faz
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
PRO V 1
Im gonna to switch my review on the ball, it definatly goes farther by maybe 5-10 yards. The spin of the ball is amazing out of the bunker with a 60* wedge. It practically stops dead. I hit a Green that slopes downhill and got it to spin back about 10 feet from 150 yards out. Customer Service yes, sent back my scotty cameron, titleist gives a deal but is a little slow Similar Products Used: Everything |
|
[Jun 21, 2001]
Richard Fazzio
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
PRO V 1
I love the ball myself, im consistantly in the low 80s high 70s and think they fit my game perfect. They are very durable, comparred to all the new high tech spin balls. The distance is not as hyped, its a little harder so it does go farther than soft cover balls and either keeps up with the distance balls or passes by a few yards. Spin wise, i cannot tell myself, all i know is by checking the mark it makes on the green. On a dry day, on a private course, i hit a 4 iron and it only went about 5 inches from the mark. Similar Products Used: Every ball made |
|
[Jun 21, 2001]
Richard Fazzio
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
PRO V 1
I love the ball myself, im consistantly in the low 80s high 70s and think they fit my game perfect. They are very durable, comparred to all the new high tech spin balls. The distance is not as hyped, its a little harder so it does go farther than soft cover balls and either keeps up with the distance balls or passes by a few yards. Spin wise, i cannot tell myself, all i know is by checking the mark it makes on the green. On a dry day, on a private course, i hit a 4 iron and it only went about 5 inches from the mark. Similar Products Used: Every ball made |